MICH. SUPREME COURT ORDERS RESENTENCINGS FOR LIFERS AGED 18, 19, 20, AFFECTING AT LEAST 830 IN MDOC


 Families AND VICTIMS of Michigan's juvenile lifers packed the State Captiol in 2006 to lobby for legislation to outlaw juvenile life without parole. No such laws were ever passed. Now Michigan Atty. General Bill Schuette is fighting every attempt by juvenile lifers to be re-sentenced as the U.S. Supreme Court mandated in Mlller v. Alabama/Hobbs v. Jackson.

FAMILIES AND VICTIMS of Michigan’s juvenile lifers packed the State Capitol in 2006 to lobby for legislation to outlaw juvenile life without parole. Michigan Citizen

VOD Editor Diane Bukowski

Writing for The Voice of Detroit on-line newspaper, published since 2010, and the Michigan Citizen, a Black-owned print weekly, from 2000-2010, Diane Bukowski has covered battles for Michigan’s juvenile lifers at length and in-depth in hundreds of stories. Those battles began with Michigan’s Second Chance Coalition of juvenile lifer families and victims waged in the first decade of this century, from 2000 to 2010 (photo above).

They continued to national victory after the U.S. Supreme Court declared mandatory juvenile life without parole unconstitutional in Miller/Jackson v. Alabama (2012) and Montgomery v. Louisiana (2016), which made Miller retroactive in the face of virulent opposition by many state prosecutors.

VOD wholeheartedly applauds the Michigan Supreme Court’s rulings in  PEOPLE OF MI V JOHN ANTONIO POOLE, handed down April 1, 2o25, and PEOPLE OF MI V MONTARIO MARQUISE TAYLOR/ANDREW CZARNECKI. 

They are proof that the battle for the most oppressed, including people of color, youth, and especially those who have been consigned to die in our prisons, continues in Michigan, despite the climate created by our fascist, racist President Donald Trump. 

Recent articles in the local media, including the Detroit News, have sought to create alarm about the prospect of the release of 830 people who have been languishing in prison, many for decades,  since their youth. The real alarm should issue about the ongoing policies of mass incarceration, resulting in thousands of wrongful convictions

Links to People v. Poole, issued April 1, 2025, and People v.Taylor/Czarnecki, issued April 10, 2025, are below.

http://voiceofdetroit.net/wp-content/uploads/MSC-People-v-Poole-2025-166813-1.pdf

http://voiceofdetroit.net/wp-content/uploads/MSC-People-v-Taylor-Czarnecki-166428_133_01-2025.pdf

VOD MOURNS DEATH OF DANIEL JONES, WARRIOR VS. LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE FOR JUVENILES AND ALL U.S. PRISONERS | VOICE OF DETROIT: The city’s independent newspaper, unbossed and unbought 

MICH. SUPREME COURT TO RULE RE: LIFERS CONVICTED UNDER 21, OTHERS CHARGED WITH FELONY MURDER | VOICE OF DETROIT: The city’s independent newspaper, unbossed and  unbought__

Put “Juvenile lifers” in VOD’s search engine at the top of this page to bring up the full array of stories VOD has published on the issue.

____________________________________________________________

Below, VOD is republishing  articles from Michigan Public Radio on the historic rulings affecting lifers who were 18, 19, and 20 at time of sentencing.

Michigan Supreme Court orders resentencing hearings for 18 yr. old lifers 

The unanimous 6-0 decision expands an earlier ruling that lifers convicted of first degree- or felony murder when they were younger than 18 are entitled to resentencing hearings. (Justice Kimberly Thomas recused herself from the case because she was involved in it before joining the Supreme Court in January.) The same will now apply to 18-year-olds.

“And at that resentencing, they’ll have the opportunity to demonstrate to the circuit court that they are rehabilitated and capable of rejoining society,” said attorney Maya Menlo with the State Appellate Defender Office says life without parole remains an option.

“Life without the possibility of parole is still on the table,” she told Michigan Public Radio. “The prosecuting attorneys in each county will review the cases and will decide whether they want to pursue a sentence of life without parole, but we expect that that sentence will be extremely rare.”

Special Assistant Wayne County Prosecutor Timothy Baughman said now prosecutors have to make some decisions on these cases.

“Prosecutors are going to have to look at them and determine, are we just going to accede to a resentencing to a term of years or is this one of the cases that we want to have a hearing on and argue that the defendant should still get life without parole? So there’s a lot of decisions that are going to have to be made by prosecutors,” he said.

The defendant is John Antonio Poole, who was 18 years old in 2002 when his uncle paid him $300 to shoot a man because his girlfriend owed him money. Poole is now 42 and being held at the Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility in Ionia.

In a related case, the state Supreme Court will rule soon on whether to expand the ruling to include lifers sentenced for crimes committed as 19- and 20-year-olds. ___________________________________________________________________________

State supreme court strikes down automatic life-without-parole for 19-, 20-year-olds

MPRN | By Rick Pluta

Published April 10, 2025 at 11:44 PM EDT 

The Michigan Supreme Court ruled Thursday that mandatory life-without-parole sentences for 19- and-20-year-old defendants violate the state Constitution.

The majority decision by a divided Supreme Court held that the sentences constitute “unconstitutionally harsh and disproportionate punishment” and will require resentencing hearings for roughly 580 prisoners convicted of murder. This follows similar decisions recently by the Supreme Court affecting inmates handed automatic life-without-parole (LWOP) sentences for crimes committed when they were 16, 17 and 18.

“Mandatorily condemning such offenders to die in prison, without first considering the attributes of youth that late adolescents and juveniles share, no longer comports with the ‘evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society,’” wrote Justice Elizabeth Welch in the majority decision, adding that violates the cruel or unusual punishment clause of the Michigan Constitution. She also wrote, “We do not foreclose the possibility that LWOP could be an appropriate punishment under rare circumstances.”

Justice Richard Bernstein wrote in a separate opinion that he would draw the line at 25 years old, based on “a consensus of relevant scientific studies.”

But Chief Justice Elizabeth Clement said the majority focused too much on the offender versus the offense.

Clement wrote in her dissent that “the majority downplays the gravity of first-degree murder.” She said, “The premeditated taking of a life is an act of the highest moral and legal consequence. A punishment of great severity is therefore proportionate.”

The cases originated in Wayne and Genesee counties. Andrew Czarnecki was 19 years old and Montario Taylor was 20 years old when they were charged with first-degree murder in separate cases. Their appeals were combined because the constitutional questions were similar.

Attorney Maya Menlo with State Appellate Defender Office said research shows young adults and older teens are very similar and the Supreme Court’s decision in these cases reflects that.

“Adolescents have brains that are not fully developed, which results in them being more reckless and also more likely to rehabilitate,” she told Michigan Public Radio. “The court adopted the scientific consensus that 19- and 20-year-olds have the same reduced culpability and the same capacity for rehabilitation as people who are 18-year-olds and younger.”

Prosecutors say the decisions are also very painful for survivors who will have to relive their loved ones’ murders in resentencing hearings.

Jon Wojtala is the Wayne County Prosecutor’s Office chief of appeals. He said the decision is not a surprise, but still “a gut punch” in part because it will require survivors to relive the tragedy of the violent loss of a loved one. He said Wayne County has more than 400 cases to deal with.

“We’re going to have to hustle very, very hard to get these cases to a point of having the resentencings and when we do have the resentencings, it’s a punch to the victims’ families, to the victims’ loved ones, to have to once again be traumatized,” he told Michigan Public Radio.

Wojtala says most of the resentencing hearings will have to take place within six months. He expects the state Supreme Court decision to be the final word.

Rick Pluta is Senior Capitol Correspondent for the Michigan Public Radio Network. He has been covering Michigan’s Capitol, government, and politics since 1987.

See stories by Rick Pluta

**********************************************************************************

VOICE OF DETROIT is a pro bono newspaper, which now returns to its current stories about those who are suffering in 0ur PRISON NATION and POLICE STATE. 

Our advocacy for those who have lost their lives to the weapons of law enforcement or their confinement to death in prison, is recognized nationally as outstanding. 

Our extensive expenses include a $465 quarterly web hosting charge  (due March 4, 2025), a P.O. Box, internet fees, office supplies, and court costs, are paid for on a fixed income and donations for our supporters, including the loved ones of those who stories we publish.

DONATE TO VOD at:
https://www.gofundme.com/donate-to-vod
Cash App 313-825-6126 $MDianeBukowski

*********************************************************************************** 

Share
This entry was posted in Prisons and police, STOP POLICE STATE PRISON NATION, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.