VOD NEEDS DONATIONS NOW–LINKS IN STORIES
VOD WELCOMES NEW SUBMISSIONS!
If you want to be published on VOD, please submit your articles, etc. to diane_bukowski@hotmail.com. Call 313-825-6126 to alert us.-
Recent Posts
- WILLIE MERRIWEATHER MEMORIAL SAT. DECEMBER 14, 4PM: HERO WHO GAVE HIS LIFE TO SAVE OTHERS FROM PRISON
- DIRTY DETROIT COPS BEAT, MADE UP CONFESSIONS FROM ALTON HUBBARD, BROTHER IDOLTHUS, IN 2004 MURDERS
- ROGER CARLOS RAY WINS EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON 3RD TRY; EXONEREE LAVONE HILL CALLS FOR RAY’S RELEASE
- ‘MIKE D’ NOT THE SHOOTER, VICTIM OF 1999 INKSTER DRIVE-BY SAYS; OIC DARIAN WILLIAMS CONVICTED OF EXTORTION
- CRIMINAL DEEDS BY COPS, PROSECUTORS, JUDGES, NOT ‘DOCUMENT PURGE’ CAUSED WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS
- PROTEST FRI. SEPT. 20 VS. INHUMANE TREATMENT OF PEOPLE INCARCERATED AT THE NEW WAYNE CO. JAIL
- JUSTICE FOR RICKY RIMMER, VICTIMS OF DPD COP, WCPO CRIMES: TUES. SEPT. 10, NEW CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER.
- JAMARIO MITCHELL FIGHTS 2001 MURDER CONVICTION SET UP BY DETROIT’S ‘DRAGNET’ COP ISAIAH (IKE) SMITH
- JACKSON-BOLANOS ACQUITTED OF WOLL MURDER; ATTYS. FILE TO DISMISS OTHER COUNTS AS DOUBLE JEOPARDY
- UK EXPECTED TO SUSPEND ARMS SALES TO ISRAEL AS ‘UNCOMMITTED’ IN TALKS WITH US VP KAMALA HARRIS
- FREE AT LAST AFTER 37 YRS: JUDGE DISMISSES MURDER CHARGES VS. PAUL CLARK ON INNOCENCE, BRADY CLAIMS
- JUDGE BLOUNT: FAIR HEARING, JUSTICE FOR RICKY RIMMER NOW!! STOP CORRUPT COPS! RALLY TUES. SEPT. 10 @1 PM
- MICH. LAWMAKERS CONSIDERING “PRODUCTIVITY CREDITS” BILL #SB 861 BARRING PEOPLE CURRENTLY IN PRISON
- MICHAEL JACKSON-BOLANOS TESTIFIES AT WOLL MURDER TRIAL, DEFENSE GIVES STUNNING CLOSING ARGUMENTS
- SUPPORT WILLIE MERRIWEATHER AT PUBLIC PAROLE HEARING JULY 11, 1PM ON ZOOM; REGISTER BY JULY 9
- SUCCESSFUL RETURNING CITIZEN DAY IN DETROIT BUILDS SUPPORT FOR PRISONERS, INSIDE AND OUTSIDE WALLS
- RIMMER CASE: JUDGE’S DAD, DPD SGT. MICHAEL BLOUNT, & SGT. JAMES HARRIS BOTH ON S.T.R.E.S.S., MAYOR’S SQUAD
- JUDGE BLOUNT DENIES RICKY RIMMER’ S MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL, HEARING ON RACIST COPS, NEW WITNESSES
- U.S. REP. RASHIDA TLAIB: ON GENOCIDE OF PALESTINIANS, INVASION OF RAFAH; SUPPORT SJP AT WSU MAY 28 @6PM
- SUPPORTERS OF PRISONERS AT WOMEN’S HURON VALLEY CONTINUE THE BATTLE AGAINST ‘THE VALLEY OF DEATH’
- VIVIAN KINCAID: ACTIVIST, POET, ACTOR/MOTHER, SISTER, NIECE, FRIEND–CELEBRATION OF LIFE APRIL 20 @2:30 PM
- INKSTER COP DARIAN WMS. EXTORTED DRUG DEALERS DURING CASE V. MICH. LIFER MICHAEL DEGRAFFENRIED
- VICTORY! JUDGE KIEFER COX DISMISSES CHARGES V. EWING, SEARCY, CITING DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS
- DARRELL EWING INVOKES RIGHT TO ATTY. FOR RE-TRIAL MARCH 25, CITES COX’S CRIPPLING ‘RULES OF THE ROAD’
- STOP THE GENOCIDE! FREE PALESTINE! REMEMBER AARON BUSHNELL! MASS MARCH IN DOWNTOWN DETROIT MAR. 2
Monthly Archives
Links
- Al Jazeera news
- All of Us Or None, prisoners and former prisoners
- All-African People's Revolutionary Party
- American Tribune, the prison experience
- Black Agenda Report
- Black is Back Coalition
- Black List
- Block Report Radio
- Color Lines
- DBA Press
- Defend Freedom of the Press
- Detroit Parents with Special Ed Students
- Free Mumia Abu Jamal
- Free Mumia Abu Jamal news
- Gray Zone
- Hood Research
- Jamahiriya News Agency–Free Libya
- Kenny Snodgrass: You Tube
- Labor Notes
- Libya 360
- Mac Speaking: Leona McElvene YouTube site
- Maryanne Godboldo
- MI Emergency Ctte. v War & Injustice
- Michigan Welfare Rights Organization
- Monthly Review Online
- Nadir's Detroit music scene
- Photography is Not a Crime
- Press TV world news
- Prison Legal News
- Project B.A.I.T.
- Real News Network
- Russia Today
- San Francisco Bay View newspaper
- SCG News: World News, Politics and Analysis
- THE GRAYZONE
- We the People of Detroit
- Wikileaks
DWSD UNIONS PROTEST IMPOSED CUTS AT JUDGE SEAN COX’S OFFICE, OCT. 25, 4:30 PM
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
By the way, Sherry, just WHERE did you get the idea that the UNION refused to disclose the make-up of its membership, and why are you and Dave both insisting that 81 percent of the DWSD workforce should be laid off before Local 207 takes any action? As far as federal courts are concerned, it is the FEDERAL SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT where AFSCME Local 207, Council 25, and SAAA filed appeals of Judge Cox’s orders. Their appeals were heard Oct. 9 and we are still waiting for their ruling. If it is against them, they can take it to the U.S. Supreme Court, which they will do. You both fail to understand the increasingly anti-worker, racist and sexist climate in which we are dealing, which permeates the banks and corporations that really rule our system, as well as the government and courts. There must be a mass movement like those of the 30’s and 60’s to overcome this. Not folks sitting back comfortably in their armchairs and making comments which serve no purpose to further that movement.
The article about federal law and protected classes is very interesting. It’s probably correct that 70% of the employees of the DWTP are female and persons of color. The consultant report states that any layoff that is proposed will be by worker classification. If the layoff is for 10 people in a given classification, the union rules require layoff by seniority of the workers in that classification. If you make the layoff by any other metric , it would require a change in the union rules, and an exception to the existing federal discrimination laws. It would be extremely doubtful that any union would agree to modify their seniority rule, that’s why they are not responding to your request. My thought is that you can ask the leaders of the ASFCME union to specify in writing just what basis they would utilize to determine which workers in that class get released when a layoff for that particular class of workers is ordered.
Hi Dave and Diane! Although, I am not an attorney, I have researched this topic for 2 1/2 years. One main point that I believe was missed is the fact that the U.S. Constitution trumps everything and any local or State Law, Contract, employment policy
that conflicts with the Constitution is Void! The Civil Rights Act-Title 7 (Disparate Impact) forces an employer to select an alternative (to mass lay-offs of Protected Classes in this case the 70%+) policy that has a lesser impact on the protected classes.
In the real world (and local and state government is not immune to this), employers must disclose the number of employees that belong to protected classes that they plan to lay-off. In other words, they are required to disclose the demographics of their employees. The City of Detroit is not being forced to do this by the unions since they refused to voluntarily give this information
I do understand that the U.S. Department of Justice Eric Holder did not respond to Conyer’s request. But, we pay our unions to enforce federal law as it pertains to our protected employment terms and conditions. Is there anyway, Diane that you could an article about the Civil Rights Act Title 7-Disparate Impact. I have research that I could share with you.
The point which both Dave and Sherry miss is that the power of the unions ultimately lies in their members’ power to withhold their labor. The sitdown strikes of the 1930’s established union recognition and collective bargaining. The unions have no magic wand to MAKE the employers, courts, and federal government comply with their demands, other than calling strikes, which Local 207 members did. Dave, when you say the union needs to agree to alter its seniority rules, you completely miss the point that virtually all of the workers in DWSD are Black and women, and have been for MANY years. Local 207 has been fighting to overturn Judge Sean Cox’s orders mandating the dismantling of DWSD in the courts, and to stop the City Council from approving the EMA contract which would eliminate 81 percent of jobs at DWSD. You appear to think those at the top of the seniority lists are white and male. That is by no means true. I worked for the city from 1974 through 1999, when I retired early. The vast majority of city employees, when I entered the workforce in 1974, were BLACK due to residency rules. Many whites fled the city after the 1967 rebellion. You seem determined to put all the blame on Local 207’s members and its leadership, instead of stepping forward yourself to participate WITH them in collective direct action, such as the strike they conducted. to stop the RACIST and SEXIST takeover of the DWSD. Dave, you appear to want the union to accept the EMA contract and Judge Cox’s orders and then deal with seniority. That is absurd. Local 207 wants to defend ALL the rights of its majority Black and women workers, as well as the rights of Detroiters, who are at least 82 percent Black, to continue OWNERSHIP of the DWSD. No matter how you twist your arguments, you come across as anti-union, not pro-worker, pro-Black or pro-women.
You are absolutely right that women and Blacks (particularly Black women) make up most of the city’s workforce. Those who work at the WWTP, members of AFSCME Local 207, struck Sept. 30 to protest the conditions to which they were and are subjected, and the proposed elimination of 81 percent of the DWSD workforce. (Put DWSD or WWTP in VOD search engine to bring up stories on strike and numerous prior stories, which show numerous Black and women workers on the picket line.) Hopefully you were among those who supported them on the picket line. They were BETRAYED by the top leadership of AFSCME Council 25. You are correct that the City of Detroit, the State of Michigan, AND the federal government (including Judge Cox) are violating federal law which protects people of color and women. The blame, however, rests on the employers, on Michigan’s virtually fascist government, and the U.S. Department of Justice as well as the federal government. U.S. Rep. John Conyers wrote to U.S. Attorney Eric Holder on Dec. 2, 2011 asking him to launch an investigation of Public Act 4 because it disproportionately affects the voting rights of most of Michigan’s African-Americans. HE HAS RECEIVED NO RESPONSE TO DATE. Public Act 4 is enabling the dismantling of the largest majority-Black city outside of Africa, Detroit. The blame does NOT rest on the shoulders of the members and leadership of Local 207, who have repeatedly raised the racist nature of the assault on their membership, and fought against all odds while on strike. As a result, they are now subject, involuntarily, to a “last-chance” agreement to retain their jobs, which means they can be fired for ANY offense in the future. Council 25 negotiated this agreement in the wake of its SHAMEFUL failure to support the workers’ strike. Put the blame where it belongs.
Again! You write about this federally illegal Consent Agreement? Why haven’t you or any of your readers ASK:
1. Is the City of Detroit following the Department of Labor’s Federal Employment Laws as it pertains to Protected Classes? This means any changes to employment terms and conditions must factor in the Protected Status of its employees. I have asked some union elected officials and they cannot give me an honest and straight answer as to if “They made sure that their employees’ federally protected rights were not being violated by the City of Detroit. There is some negative entity in this City and State that is surpressing the overall Demographics of public workers (both City, DPS, County and State) which Women and Blacks make up approximately 70% of the workforce. By suppressing the Demographics, the unions have enabled the State of MI. and the City of Detroit to bypass the Civil Rights Act, Federal Employment Laws, and all other Constitutional Laws that pertains to people of color and women. Somebody is getting paid a lot of money to “Not Rock the Civil Rights – Disparate Impact Boat! Take the Devil’s money and he will Reward you too! They will eventually have to atone for this.